what's act 302 | 307 | 403 | 383 MOST DENGRES ACT

INDIA

TIME'S REPORT 

WELCOME TO THE BLOG 

   IN THIS ACTICLE DISCUSS ABOUT ACT 302 ,305, 307 

 WHAT IS ACT 302 ? 

  Central Government Act. Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code. 302. Punishment for murder. —Whoever commits murder shall be punished with death, or 1[imprisonment for life], and shall also be liable to fine.

 Punishment for Murder- Section 302

We often get to hear that the Court has found someone guilty of committing a crime of murder under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). In cases like these, the Court penalizes the murderer either with death penalty or life imprisonment. However, a huge number of Indian population is yet unaware of what section 302 of IPC deals with. Here’s a glimpse of what section 302 is

 ANOTHER ACT 307 ?

 Attempt to murder.—Whoever does any act with such intention or knowledge, and under such circumstances that, if he by that act caused death, he would be guilty of murder, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine; and if hurt 

For the purpose of conviction under Section 307 IPC, the prosecution has to establish (i) the intention to commit murder; and (ii) the act done by the accused. The burden is on the prosecution that the accused had attempted to commit the murder of the prosecution witness

Another act 403 ? 

 

   finds a valuable ring, not knowing to whom it belongs. A sells it immediately without attempting to discover the owner. A is guilty of an offence under this section. CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENCE Punishment—Imprisonment for 2 years, or fine, or both—Non-cogniz­able—Bailable—Triable by any Magistrate—Compoundable by the owner of the property misappropriated with the permission of the court. comments Dishonest misappropriation or conversion of property The words ’converts to his own use’ necessarily connote the use or dealing with the property in derogation of the rights of the owner; Ramaswami Nadar v. State of Madras, AIR 1958 SC 56. Ingreidents It has been held that the word ‘dishonestly’ and ‘misappropriate’ are necessary ingredients of an offence under section 403. Any dispute being about recovery of money is purely of civil nature. Hence a criminal complaint regarding such a matter is not maintainable, U. Dhar v. State of Jharkhand, AIR 2003 SC 974.

 

 #Another act most denger act 383 ? 

1925

383. Revocation of certificate.—A certificate granted under this Part may be revoked for any of the following causes, namely:—

(a) that the proceedings to obtain the certificate were defective in substance;

(b) that the certificate was obtained fraudulently by the making of a false suggestion, or by the concealment from the Court of something material to the case;

(c) that the certificate was obtained by means of an untrue allegation of a fact essential in point of law to justify the grant thereof, though such allegation was made in ignorance or inadvertently;

(d) that the certificate has become useless and inoperative through circumstances;

(e) that a decree or order made by a competent Court in a suit or other proceeding with respect to effects comprising debts or securities specified in the certificate renders it proper that the certificate should be revoked